Human-Powered Vehicle Manufacturing

Guacamaya
Manufacturing

Converting a competition-vehicle design into a functional prototype through fabrication, mechanical integration, testing, and rapid problem-solving.

Sportsmanship Award
Guacamaya human-powered vehicle during final assembly

Guacamaya vehicle assembly and subsystem integration

Competition

ASME HPVC

Contribution

Fabrication & Assembly

Processes

Welding & Tube Bending

Recognition

Sportsmanship Award

The Challenge

Build a Competition Vehicle Under Real Constraints

The manufacturing phase required converting the team’s CAD models and engineering analyses into a physical trike capable of steering, braking, transmitting power, and protecting its rider.

The work was completed under schedule pressure while managing limited fabrication experience, subsystem interference, procurement delays, and unexpected component shortages.

My Contribution

Fabrication and Integration

  • Assisted with tube bending, welding, drilling, cutting, grinding, polishing, and frame preparation.
  • Supported front-axle, steering, braking, and drivetrain integration.
  • Helped develop and install the temporary universal-joint replacement.
  • Participated in physical testing, repairs, competition preparation, and final assembly.

Manufacturing Process

From Steel Frame to Working Trike

Manufacturing progressed through frame preparation, component fabrication, subsystem assembly, and repeated physical testing.

STAGE 01

Prepare the frame

The initial steel frame required cleaning, preparation, inspection, and modification before final subsystem installation could begin.

STAGE 02

Form and fabricate components

Tubes were measured, bent, cut, drilled, fitted, and welded to convert the CAD design into a functional competition frame.

STAGE 03

Integrate the front axle

The front region combined steering, braking, drivetrain, wheel, and structural components inside a highly constrained assembly.

STAGE 04

Test and refine the vehicle

The team conducted steering, braking, power-transmission, weight, and road tests before transporting the vehicle to competition.

Hands-On Engineering

Fabrication Methods

1

Tube Bending

Formed structural tubing while accounting for geometry, springback, alignment, and fit with surrounding frame components.

2

Welding

Developed practical welding skills while joining frame members, mounting brackets, and temporary drivetrain components.

3

Cutting and Drilling

Prepared tube lengths, holes, attachment points, and interfaces required for assembly and subsystem installation.

4

Grinding and Finishing

Cleaned welds, polished surfaces, prepared the frame for coating, and improved fit between fabricated components.

Tube bending during Guacamaya fabrication
Tube-bending equipment used during frame fabrication
Manufacturing work around the Guacamaya front axle
Front-axle manufacturing and subsystem integration

Primary Manufacturing Challenge

Missing Front-Axle Universal Joints

The front-wheel-drive design required four custom universal joints to transmit torque while allowing the wheels to steer. Only two of the required four joints were delivered before the competition deadline.

Original universal joint intended for the Guacamaya front axle
Intended front-axle universal joint
Temporary welded replacement joint installed on the Guacamaya vehicle
Temporary replacement joint after modification and welding

RESPONSE 01

Procurement shortfall

The driven front axle required four custom universal joints, but only two were delivered before the vehicle needed to be completed.

RESPONSE 02

Identify an available substitute

The team investigated commercially available ratchet attachments that could provide limited angular articulation and transmit torque.

RESPONSE 03

Adapt and weld the components

The substitute components were modified, aligned, and welded into the front-axle assembly as a constrained temporary solution.

RESPONSE 04

Validate basic operation

Initial testing confirmed acceptable steering motion and power transmission, allowing the trike to become operational before competition.

A Constrained Temporary Adaptation

The substitute joint was not treated as an ideal permanent design. It was a time-constrained response intended to recover basic vehicle functionality after a critical procurement failure.

Manufacturing Gallery

Fabrication and Assembly

Initial steel frame before restoration and manufacturing work
Initial frame condition
Tube-bending equipment used during Guacamaya fabrication
Tube-bending process
Side view of the Guacamaya steel frame during fabrication
Frame fabrication and preparation
Rear view of the Guacamaya frame during fabrication
Rear-frame structure
Front-axle manufacturing and component integration
Front-axle manufacturing
Guacamaya drivetrain during manufacturing
Drivetrain fabrication and assembly
Guacamaya human-powered vehicle during physical assembly
Vehicle assembly and integration
UPRM HPVC team with the Guacamaya vehicle
UPRM HPVC team

Testing and Competition

Physical Validation

The videos document manufacturing progress, subsystem testing, the completed vehicle, and the eventual endurance-event failure.

Frame Preparation and Painting

Surface preparation and coating of the fabricated steel frame.

Frame Weight Test

Early physical evaluation of the frame before final vehicle integration.

Pre-Competition Brake Test

Testing the vehicle’s braking response before the competition events.

Competition Speed Test

Operation of the completed Guacamaya vehicle during competition testing.

Completed HPVC Vehicle

Final assembled vehicle after fabrication and subsystem integration.

Endurance Event Failure

Competition footage documenting the drivetrain failure during the endurance event.

Team Recognition

Sportsmanship Award

After our drivetrain failure, the team remained engaged and assisted other competitors throughout the event.

Competition Outcome

Success, Failure, and Professional Growth

The adapted joints enabled the trike to steer and transmit power during initial testing, allowing the team to transport a functional vehicle to Virginia.

During competition, the temporary drivetrain solution failed and the front axle lost its powered functionality. Although the performance result was disappointing, the experience exposed the importance of procurement planning, fatigue testing, alignment, and validating emergency design changes under realistic loads.

Reflection

Lessons Learned

Procurement risk must be managed early

Critical custom components should have backup suppliers, earlier deadlines, or alternative designs prepared before manufacturing reaches its final stages.

Temporary solutions require realistic validation

The replacement joints operated during initial testing but were not fully validated under extended cyclic loading and competition-level forces.

Manufacturing tolerances affect system performance

Small alignment errors in the steering and drivetrain interfaces can increase resistance, reduce articulation, and create concentrated loads.

Design and manufacturing must develop together

A component that works in CAD may require additional clearance, fixturing, accessibility, and adjustment once it is physically assembled.

Competition results are not the only measure of success

Despite the drivetrain failure, the project developed practical fabrication, troubleshooting, teamwork, and engineering-integration experience.

Professionalism continues after failure

After our vehicle could no longer compete effectively, the team supported other universities and received the Sportsmanship Award.

Technical Documentation

HPVC Critical Design Review

View the complete team report for the vehicle design, engineering analyses, subsystem selection, testing procedures, and competition requirements.

View HPVC Report